Fair prices
Purchase on account
CH warehouse
12 % discount* from 12.12.-23.12.24 | * on orders of CHF 50 or more, except bundles (discount will be deducted automatically).
12 % discount* from 12.12.-23.12.24 | * on orders of CHF 50 or more, except bundles (discount will be deducted automatically).
The product was added to your shopping cart.
Go to shopping cart

Speedcubing methods in comparison

Cube it like a pro: find your ideal style. Are you looking for a method that will quickly turn you into a cube master? Then you've come to the right place. Whether you are a fan of classic algorithms, find your way intuitively or want to minimise your turns, here is a brief overview of the three most popular speedcubing methods: CFOP, Roux and ZZ. We have even compiled the algorithms for the CFOP method in detail. Grab your cube and find out which style suits you best!

Table of Contents

CFOP, Roux and ZZ – Which method rocks the cube?

In speedcubing, there are different approaches that are specifically designed to solve the cube in the shortest possible time. Each method offers unique advantages, depending on the preferred style and the individual goals of the speedcuber. However, before learning these methods, it is helpful to understand the specific notations of cubing, as these form the basis for all further instructions and algorithms.
Why are the methods so important for speedcubers?
  • Speed: The main goal of speedcubing is to solve the cube extremely quickly. By using efficient methods, cubers can reduce the number of moves required and reach high speeds.
  • Competitive advantage: In competitions, choosing and mastering the right method can provide a significant advantage. Experienced cubers often choose a method that best supports their personal strengths.
  • Flexibility and adaptability: Different methods offer different approaches and strategies that allow the cuber to solve the cube in a way that works best for them. This variety of methods promotes a deeper understanding of cube mechanics and allows cubers to adapt and improve their technique depending on the situation.


CFOP method (Fridrich method)

The CFOP method, also called the Fridrich method, is one of the most popular methods. CFOP is well known among speedcubers and is used by world record holders such as Feliks Zemdegs, as it boosts fast and efficient solves. This method offers a structured strategy that is ideal for both beginners and experienced cubers. If you want to master the method yourself, we have put together a step-by-step guide that will pave the way for you to reach faster times.

Roux method

The Roux method, developed by French speedcuber Gilles Roux, is an innovative speedcubing technique that emerged in the early 2000s. This method relies less on memorising extensive algorithms and more on intuition and direct problem solving. The Roux method requires fewer turns and promotes a deep understanding of the cube structure. It offers an excellent alternative for cubers who prefer a more intuitive and strategically efficient approach to speedcubing and want to improve their solve times through a deep understanding of the cube.

ZZ method

The ZZ method was developed by the Polish speedcuber Zbigniew Zborowski. This technique is effective in speedcubing and is characterised by the early orientation of all edges, which reduces the number of turns during the solve. It is efficient and facilitates a high solving speed, ideal for cubers who prefer a structured and precise approach.


Note from the cubeless team: So that you can use the methods effectively, we recommend you first familiarise yourself with the notations.


The methods in comparison

Whether you rely on the tried-and-tested CFOP algorithms, build clever blocks with the Roux method or make fewer cube moves thanks to the ZZ method – each strategy has its own strengths. But which one suits your speedcubing style best? Take a look at the comparison and find out which method will make you a cube pro the fastest!

Criterion CFOP Roux ZZ
Number of turns High Medium Low
Algorithms Many Few Medium
Intuition Low High Medium
Flexibility Medium High Medium
Regrips Frequent Few Minimal
Efficiency Medium High High